地址:北京市海淀區(qū)中關(guān)村北大街100號(北樓)北京大學(xué)建筑與景觀設(shè)計(jì)學(xué)院一層 Email:info@landscape.cn
Copyright ? 2013-2022 景觀中國(www.cncwe.org)版權(quán)所有 京ICP備05068035號 京公海網(wǎng)安備 110108000058號
人類與自然世界之間存在復(fù)雜的互動關(guān)系,而生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)對于詮釋這種紐帶關(guān)系意義重大。生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)指自然界賦予人類社會的非物質(zhì)裨益與福祉,包括自然游憩、審美體驗(yàn)、場所感知、文化遺產(chǎn)、靈感啟迪等。然而,社會的快速演變不僅深刻改變了人類行為,也影響了人地關(guān)系,重構(gòu)了生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)和人類的供需關(guān)系。景觀實(shí)踐者應(yīng)當(dāng)采用創(chuàng)新方法來審視和理解自然生態(tài)系統(tǒng)與人類文化依戀之間的復(fù)雜關(guān)系,并通過景觀設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐使這種關(guān)系更加可持續(xù)。生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)具有橋接景觀實(shí)踐與社會變化的潛力,可為理解人類與自然之間的聯(lián)系及推動可持續(xù)發(fā)展提供多學(xué)科視角。
生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù);景觀設(shè)計(jì)學(xué);人地互動;社會變化;社會-生態(tài)系統(tǒng)
Intangible Bonds:Cultural Ecosystem Services and Landscape Practices
文晨1,2,徐海韻3,托比亞斯·普利寧格4,5
自古以來,人類與自然密不可分。我們改造、塑造自然,以滿足自身的需求和欲望;自然是我們的靈感與平和之源,并如此深刻地影響了人類社會,以至于我們對其產(chǎn)生了強(qiáng)烈的情感依戀,將之嵌入文化與觀念中,踐行于我們的人居環(huán)境建設(shè)。然而,當(dāng)今社會的快速演變正在撼動這種人與自然聯(lián)系的基石,技術(shù)的進(jìn)步、社會價值觀的轉(zhuǎn)變,以及不斷增長的人口需求都在沖擊著我們與自然間的聯(lián)系。這些改變的速度之快,已令長期以來維系人類生存的生態(tài)系統(tǒng)無法承載。展望未來,我們需要發(fā)展新的途徑來理解和珍視自然生態(tài)系統(tǒng)與人類文化依戀之間的復(fù)雜關(guān)系,并思考如何通過景觀規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐使這二者間的紐帶關(guān)系更加可持續(xù)。
景觀設(shè)計(jì)學(xué)既關(guān)注自然的生態(tài)價值,也關(guān)注其文化和社會價值。生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)(Cultural Ecosystem Services)是生態(tài)系統(tǒng)為人類社會帶來的非物質(zhì)裨益與福祉,包括自然游憩、審美體驗(yàn)、場所感知、文化遺產(chǎn)、靈感啟迪等[1]。作為生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)的重要組成部分,生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)在休閑游憩、精神療愈,以及維護(hù)文化多樣性和特有性等方面都發(fā)揮著不可或缺的作用?!肚晟鷳B(tài)系統(tǒng)評估》(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment)指出,生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)評估能揭示生態(tài)系統(tǒng)動態(tài)變化對人類福祉的影響,理解自然與人類社會的聯(lián)系與相互作用,并促進(jìn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。如今,生態(tài)系統(tǒng)服務(wù)理論逐漸成為景觀規(guī)劃的支撐理論之一,生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)也備受國內(nèi)外景觀實(shí)踐者的關(guān)注,主要議題包括如何通過有效的規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐來理解復(fù)雜的人地關(guān)系、評估規(guī)劃方案、協(xié)調(diào)不同的利益相關(guān)方,以及有效回應(yīng)社會問題等[2]。
近年來,中國與世界多地都在經(jīng)歷高速城鎮(zhèn)化,人口結(jié)構(gòu)、生活方式及審美偏好等方面也發(fā)生著快速變化。這些變化深刻改變了人類行為,也影響了人地關(guān)系:居住形式、出行習(xí)慣、人口分布、家庭結(jié)構(gòu)的改變影響了我們與景觀之間的聯(lián)系,重構(gòu)了生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)和人類的供需關(guān)系,也促使我們關(guān)注老年人、兒童、城市新移民、農(nóng)村留守人員等不同的社會群體。與此同時,人們在景觀感知、審美偏好、自然游憩風(fēng)尚、生活方式等方面的變化——例如共享單車的廣泛使用、社交媒體和短視頻的流行、網(wǎng)紅地打卡現(xiàn)象——也影響了我們對景觀和生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)的理解[3][4]。
生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)的內(nèi)涵決定了其具有橋接景觀實(shí)踐與社會變化的潛力,可為景觀設(shè)計(jì)學(xué)科提供一個審視人地關(guān)系的多學(xué)科視角。相關(guān)理論、方法和工具也能幫助從業(yè)者更好地開展景觀解讀、評估、規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)與管理工作[2][5]。在本期中,我們將從理論、方法等維度探討生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)與景觀實(shí)踐的關(guān)系。相關(guān)研究議題包括建設(shè)“全域旅游”背景下區(qū)域尺度的游憩潛力預(yù)測、運(yùn)用網(wǎng)絡(luò)評論數(shù)據(jù)對城市公園進(jìn)行生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)的感知測定和評估,以及景觀設(shè)計(jì)師在兒童早期自然教育中扮演的角色等。本期還呈現(xiàn)了生態(tài)系統(tǒng)文化服務(wù)這一理論的發(fā)展歷程,以及為什么新技術(shù)和新概念的引入能夠幫助它進(jìn)一步演化。此外,來自夏威夷的案例表明,在經(jīng)年累月的環(huán)境和社會危機(jī)下,景觀設(shè)計(jì)專業(yè)應(yīng)通過重塑生態(tài)和文化的關(guān)系,建設(shè)一個自主決定、公平和具有韌性的未來。
以下為文章英文版本,引用格式見文末
For generations, humans have been intrinsically tied to the natural world, modifying and molding it to suit our needs and desires. Nature has been a source of inspiration and peace to us, influencing our cultures and beliefs, and creating a strong emotional attachment to the natural world. However, our society’s fast evolution is testing the very foundations of this connection. Technological advancements, social values shifts, and the increasing demands of a growing population have all combined to push the boundaries of our contact with nature. The pace at which these changes are taking place is even exceeding the ecosystems that have sustained us for so long. As we look ahead, it is becoming evident that we will need to develop new approaches to understanding and appreciating the complex cultural relationships that exist between the natural ecosystem and our cultural attachment, as well as to build a more sustainable interaction via landscape practices.
Landscape Architecture concerns not only the ecological values of nature but also its social and cultural values. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) are the intangible and non-material benefits delivered from nature to human societies, including nature-based tourism, landscape aesthetics, sense of place, cultural heritage, and spiritual inspiration[1]. As one pillar of Ecosystem Services (ES), CES play significant roles in leisure activities, cognitive recovery, and the conservation of cultural diversity and uniqueness. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment suggests that evaluation of CES can reveal how the dynamics of the ecosystem impact human well-being, facilitate understanding their interactions, and promote sustainable development. Nowadays, ES are among the central topics in global landscape research and has become mainstream theories in supporting landscape planning. Chinese and the global landscape practitioners also pay great attention to CES, especially regarding how to understand complex human-nature relationships, how to evaluate CES for planning, how to help communicate with different stakeholders, and how to respond to social issues with effective planning and design[2].
Recently, China, together with the world, is undergoing rapid changes, including urbanization, demographic changes, changing lifestyles, and dynamic aesthetic preference. Those changes influence both human behaviors and the human-nature relationships. On one hand, societies nowadays have different resident forms, travel behaviors, population distributions, and family structure. All are influencing how we interact with landscapes. The social dynamics reshape the supply?demand relationships between CES and people, and enhance our concerns on different social groups, including the elderly, children, new citizens, and left-behind people in rural areas. On the other hand, human behaviors are expressed in terms of landscape perception, aesthetic preferences, fashions of nature-based recreation, and lifestyles[3][4]. For example, the widely-use of shared bikes, social media, short videos, and web celebrities’ sites also impact how we understand landscapes and CES.
The nature of CES demonstrates that they can be the potential bridge between landscape architecture and social changes. Since CES are multi-disciplinary, they can better help Landscape Architecture understand the meanings of human-nature relationships. Their theories, methods, and tools can help support understanding, assessing, planning, designing, and managing landscape[2][5]. This special issue covers broad topics related to CES and the landscape practice, ranging from theories, methods, and others. There are research articles on topics such as predicting recreational potential at the regional scale within the context of “all-for-one tourism,” the use of online comment data to assess perceptions and evaluations of urban parks’ ecosystem cultural services, and the role of landscape architects in early childhood nature-based education. We also present the evolution of the theory of ecosystem cultural services and the reasons why the introduction of new technology and concepts can aid in its evolution. Another case from Hawaii highlights how landscape architecture should reconstruct the interaction between ecology and culture to establish a self-determined, fair, and resilient future in the face of environmental and social catastrophes.
部分參考文獻(xiàn)
本文引用格式 / PLEASE CITE THIS ARTICLE AS
Wen, C., Xu, H., Plieninger, T. (2022). Intangible bonds: Cultural ecosystem services and landscape practices. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 10(5), 4?7. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-1-010027
版權(quán)聲明:本文版權(quán)歸原作者所有,請勿以景觀中國編輯版本轉(zhuǎn)載。如有侵犯您的權(quán)益請及時聯(lián)系,我們將第一時間刪除。
投稿郵箱:info@landscape.cn
項(xiàng)目咨詢:18510568018(微信同號)